P and I have season tickets at Chelsea Football Club. It has to be said that P’s enthusiasm for the game is not unqualified but, as gesture of willingness and spousal compromise she indulges me. Recently she came home to tell me that an irritating senior colleague (“ISC”) of hers had asked whether he could sit in her seat when Chelsea play his team later in the season. Giving up her seat is no great sacrifice for P so she agreed and informed me that I was going to have to play host. She gave me a stern warning as the last time this happened I chaperoned the son of another of P’s colleagues. He told me, untruthfully, that he was 18, expressed an enthusiasm for all things beer-related and when I delivered him to his mother he proceeded to projectile vomit in front of her before collapsing drunkenly in the backseat of the car. ISC, however, is into his 50s and presumably has the measure by now of his own tolerance for alcohol.
ISC is of an earlier generation of barristers who prided themselves on making submissions laced with theatrically-expressed if oblique put-downs of their opponents. It may seem odd that people ever took a professional pride in being a wanker but it is still surprisingly common. Needless to say, I am not relishing an afternoon at the match with him.
This evening I had a call from P who is in Brighton visiting a friend. I asked her how her day had gone.
P: “Oh it was awful. ISC barely escaped with his life. I was having a tough time with 6 people asking me to do things at once. ISC was representing one of the other parties and rather than help me he spent his time making snide interjections and embarrassing me in Court in order to show off to his clients. I was so upset. Really, I could have throttled him”.
M: “Is this ISCÂ that I am taking to the football?”
P: “Yes”
At this point the work of several hundered thousand years of painstaking evolutionary advancement fell away from me. I actually began to seethe with anger; hair grew on the backs of my hands and I ground my teeth till they cracked. I felt P had more than enough to be dealing with at the moment without one of her own colleagues being a prick to her. Using some very florid langauge I suggested P should inform him that he lacked the attributes of a gentleman, indicate that an apology would be welcome and make it clear that he should put the prospect of attending the game entirely from his mind (I used fewer but more colorful words to convey all this). I went on to point out that if he did come to the game he could expect that there would be one or two things that I would want to say to him.
P asked me to calm down. “It’s just how he is” she said tolerantly. “I’ll get over it soon enough. I don’t want you tackling him over it”.
Tackling him? Thrashing him was more what I had in mind. Fighting a duel, smacking him in his pompous barrister’s face; beating him with a table leg – I didn’t much care as long as it involved ultra violence and his coughing an apology to P from behind broken teeth and swollen lips. This is all bonkers. No doubt in an hour’s time I will wonder how I could have had this reaction. I will return to writing my apercus into my little leather-bound notebook with a fine nib and sipping a medium sherry as I ponder a poem or two. I will reflect that P is a tough cookie and perfectly capable of putting an obnoxious opponent straight without her husband lumbering in mouthing obscenities and empty threats. Nevertheless I am at present flooded with testosterone and barking like a walrus.
Has anyone else ever suffered an unexpected regression to troglodyte social skills?
